The recent debate and Q&A session on Kiama’s mayoral election was a striking example of community engagement at its best. These events are indispensable for equipping residents with the knowledge needed to make informed decisions on critical local issues. This forum was a prime opportunity for community members to hear a range of perspectives and pose their questions directly to the experts.

The evening began with a nod to the expertise and experience of the panel, setting a tone of informed discussion. This was followed by an acknowledgment that the community had been starved of information on this crucial decision. The Bugle was congratulated for admirably filling this void, providing much-needed education and encouraging residents to do their research, including investigating how other councils operate.

One of the primary concerns aired was the financial impact of changing the election system. This information is essential for residents to understand the economic implications of their choices.

The debate also delved into the stability and accountability of leadership. While a directly elected mayor might better reflect community priorities, there were legitimate concerns about political influence and the potential for internal council politics to cause disruption.

Questions about handling an ineffective mayor highlighted the complexities of both election models. Proponents argued that a directly elected mayor is more accountable to the community. It ensures that the choice of mayor is in the hands of the people, supporting the principle of democracy. It reduces the risk of internal council politics affecting the mayoral position, as was cited in examples from other councils like Wollongong and Shellharbour. 

The revelation that removing a poorly performing directly elected mayor could involve significant time and expense was a reality check. It emphasised the need for robust mechanisms to ensure effective leadership.

What became clear during the session was that many in the audience felt they lacked sufficient knowledge about the pros and cons of each election model. The chance to engage directly with experts was highly valued, providing residents with a more comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand.

The feeling in the room was that community debates and Q&A sessions like this one are invaluable. They empower residents with the information necessary to make informed decisions and ensure that local governance truly reflects the community’s needs and desires. 

As Kiama heads towards its next election, the insights gained from this session will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping its future.