Opinion by Lynne Strong The decision by Kiama Council to challenge Transport for NSW’s move to reduce the speed limits on Jamberoo Road has sparked debate. On one hand, there’s the claim of standing as “the voice of the community.” On the other, there’s the question: who truly represents the community’s voice? Is it the loud voices on social media, or does it lie in the quieter consensus of evidence and shared values?My experience tells me that science often tells a clearer story than social media ever can. And in this case, the science is blunt: speed kills. Every kilometre faster increases the risk of an accident and its severity. The evidence behind speed limit reductions isn’t about inconvenience—it’s about saving lives.We’ve all felt the frustration of slowing down on roads we know well, especially when they feel safe. But accidents don’t announce themselves; they happen in the split second it takes to lose control or miss a turn. Jamberoo Road, with its curves and changing conditions, is no exception.This isn’t about caving to bureaucracy or giving up freedoms. It’s about stepping up as a community and acknowledging that safety must come first. Reducing speed limits might not feel popular, but popularity doesn’t bring back lives lost in preventable accidents.So, the real question isn’t whether council decisions reflect the loudest voices but whether they reflect what’s right for the whole community—especially its most vulnerable. Slowing down isn’t easy, but if it means fewer accidents and saved lives, isn’t it worth the adjustment?As the debate continues, let’s hope our councillors focus less on noisy opinions and more on the science and safety that should guide us all.Join us in saving lives. Slow down today

Standing up for what you believe in can be daunting in any context, but in local government, it’s uniquely fraught. For councillors, stepping into public life often means working hard to build trust, listening to all sides, and advocating for solutions that serve the broader community. Yet, as noble as that sounds, it’s not always straightforward.Unlike mayors or CEOs, councillors are rarely the ultimate decision-makers. Their power lies in collaboration—bringing others to the table, making a case for a shared vision, and hoping their peers see the same value in the proposal. It’s less about being the loudest voice in the room and more about being a strategic negotiator, navigating diverse perspectives to forge a path forward.But here’s the rub: collaboration relies on shared values, and shared values aren’t guaranteed. Imagine proposing a policy you know would bring significant benefits to the community. Perhaps it’s a plan to secure green spaces, invest in affordable housing, or streamline approvals for local businesses. You’ve done your research, consulted with stakeholders, and presented a clear path forward. Yet, when it comes to the vote, support evaporates.Why? Because standing up for something—especially something big—requires more than evidence or logic. It requires other people to believe in the same priorities and to have the courage to support them publicly. It requires trust, not just in the idea, but in the leader proposing it.For those who take this path, disappointment is common. Political life means putting yourself out there repeatedly, knowing you might fail more often than you succeed. It means watching good ideas falter because they weren’t popular enough, or because political dynamics overshadowed the community's needs.The courage to lead in this environment cannot be understated. It’s not easy to stand in front of a room and argue for the greater good, knowing that others might be unwilling to stand beside you. It’s even harder when those decisions affect the people you see in the supermarket, at school pickups, or in local parks.So why do it? Because for those who believe in service, the reward of getting it right is worth the struggle. Because when you do find allies who share your vision, the victories—however rare—are transformative. And because even in defeat, standing up for what’s right builds a legacy of integrity and a foundation for future change.For anyone stepping into public life, the lesson is clear: it’s not about being the ultimate decision-maker. It’s about having the resilience to lead, the humility to collaborate, and the conviction to keep trying—even when the odds are stacked against you.

The email looked convincing. It claimed to be from Priceline Pharmacy, offering me an exclusive prize—a luxury Lancome perfume—for simply answering a few questions. The branding was spot on, the images polished, and the promise tempting. At first glance, it appeared legitimate.But something about it made me pause. Why would Priceline, a reputable company, need me to answer questions before sending a prize they claimed I’d already won? I checked the sender’s email address, and that’s when it became obvious—"[email protected]…” was a far cry from anything official. The email was a scam, and it reminded me how important it is to stay vigilant.Scams like these are designed to look authentic. They prey on our emotions—excitement at winning something, trust in a familiar brand, or the urgency to act quickly. And for a moment, I understood why so many people fall for them. But by slowing down, looking closer, and questioning what was being asked of me, I spotted the red flags.Simple steps to protect yourselfThis experience reinforced a critical message: staying alert can save you from falling into a scammer’s trap. Here are some tips to keep in mind:Verify the sender’s email address: Legitimate companies use official domains. Anything else is a red flag.Avoid acting on urgency: Scammers often pressure you to act fast. Take a moment to pause and think.Go straight to the source: If in doubt, visit the company’s official website or contact them directly.Don’t give away personal information: If someone asks for sensitive details before delivering on a promise, it’s probably a scam.Scams are becoming more sophisticated, and even cautious people can find themselves second-guessing. That’s why it’s so important to keep sharing stories and reminders like this one. The more we talk about these tactics, the better equipped we’ll all be to outsmart them.

Opinion by Lynne StrongIn a troubling trend, teenage boys are increasingly experiencing eating disorders, driven in part by the pervasive influence of social media and fitness influencers. Platforms like TikTok and Instagram, often flooded with unrealistic fitness goals and restrictive diet promotions, are shaping harmful behaviors in young males who are seeking to emulate these ideals.This issue reflects a broader cultural shift that no longer sees eating disorders as challenges faced predominantly by females. Boys are now vulnerable to unhealthy messages that link body image with self-worth, leading to restrictive diets, over-exercise, or unsafe supplement use. Alarmingly, these behaviours can result in both physical and mental health challenges, including nutritional deficiencies, anxiety, and long-term disordered eating patterns.While raising awareness is essential, it’s equally important to avoid normalising this behaviour. Communities must promote a healthy body image and encourage critical consumption of media, particularly among youth. Schools, parents, and mentors can play a pivotal role by fostering environments that value well-being over appearance and by equipping young people with the tools to question harmful narratives.Conversations about balanced nutrition, the value of diverse body types, and the dangers of social media's curated content can help steer boys—and all youth—towards healthier perspectives. Proactive measures, including the inclusion of media literacy programs and access to mental health resources, are vital to combating this growing concern.This is not just about awareness; it’s about taking action. By working together, we can create a culture where young people feel valued for who they are, not how they look. If this topic resonates with your family, consider reaching out to local support services or starting a conversation with your child today.Where to get help:Addressing the rise of eating disorders among teenage boys requires comprehensive support and education. Here are some recommended initiatives and resources:1. Butterfly FoundationThe Butterfly Foundation offers nationwide support for individuals affected by eating disorders and body image issues. They provide a National Helpline (1800 33 4673) available from 8 am to midnight (AEST/AEDT), seven days a week, offering free and confidential assistance. Services include phone support, online chat, and email communication. Additionally, their Referral Database helps locate professionals and services across Australia. Butterfly Conservation Australia2. headspaceheadspace is the National Youth Mental Health Foundation, providing early intervention mental health services to young people aged 12–25. They offer support for issues like eating disorders, with centres across Australia and online services through eheadspace. Resources are available for both young individuals and their families to understand and address eating disorders. Headspace3. Eating Disorders Families Australia (EDFA)EDFA is dedicated to supporting families and carers of individuals with eating disorders. They provide education, counselling, and advocacy to empower families in their journey. EDFA also offers a directory of professionals specialising in eating disorders, aiding in finding appropriate care. EDFA4. Kids HelplineKids Helpline is a free, confidential 24/7 online and phone counselling service for young people aged 5 to 25. They address various issues, including eating disorders, and provide resources to help understand and manage these conditions. Kids Helpline5. School and Community Education ProgramsImplementing educational programs in schools and communities can promote healthy body image and critical media literacy. Organizations like the Butterfly Foundation offer programs designed to provide practical strategies and resources to support positive body image among young Australians. Butterfly Conservation Australia6. Professional Medical SupportConsulting with healthcare professionals, such as general practitioners, psychologists, and dietitians, is crucial for early intervention and treatment of eating disorders. The Butterfly Foundation's Referral Database can assist in finding professionals experienced in treating eating disorders. Butterfly Conservation AustraliaEngaging with these initiatives can provide comprehensive support for teenage boys struggling with eating disorders, promoting recovery and well-being.

By now, many of us have heard Macquarie Dictionary’s word of the year, and if you haven’t, brace yourself. It’s “enshittification.” Yes, that’s the actual word—and it’s depressingly perfect for these times. But before you clutch your pearls or scramble to Google, take a breath. Let’s talk about what this means for those of us who still remember life without the internet.Enshittification, coined by Canadian writer Cory Doctorow, describes the process by which everything online turns, well, to rubbish. Think about it: once-delightful platforms are now bloated with ads, pop-ups, and paywalls. Remember when Facebook was fun? Now it’s just a family reunion you didn’t RSVP for. Instagram? It’s the TVSN channel. And TikTok? Well, some of us don’t even have an account, which might explain why our grandchildren roll their eyes when we ask what they’re laughing at on their phones.Macquarie’s runners-up aren’t much better for our collective self-esteem. The silver medal went to “RTD” (Right To Disconnect). Apparently, people younger than 30 think it’s groundbreaking to have time off from work emails. We just called it “5 o’clock.” And then there’s “rawdogging.” No, not what you think. It means living life without the usual crutches, like caffeine or screens. So, that’s what the kids are calling it when they forget their phone charger?Every year, these words creep into the dictionary, and every year, I feel a little more like my grandmother trying to make sense of “groovy.” When did life become a constant parade of acronyms, memes, and jargon? Is it a sign of cultural decay, or are we just getting old? Maybe both.The truth is, trying to keep up with this linguistic churn can feel exhausting. If your grandchildren are peppering their conversations with terms like “brain rot” (a stupor caused by meme overexposure) or “de-influencing” (telling people what not to buy), you’re not alone in nodding politely and later Googling what they meant. And acronyms? Don’t even get me started. I recently overheard “FOMO” and “YOLO” in the same sentence, and I’m still recovering.But here’s the kicker: do we even care? Is it so bad to let the younger generation have their slang while we stick to words like “dreadful” and “splendid”? Maybe not. Staying in touch doesn’t mean downloading TikTok. It might just mean asking, “What does that mean?” and laughing along when the explanation is more absurd than the word itself.So, the next time you hear “enshittification,” don’t panic. Just think of it as a reminder that language—and life—keeps evolving. And if it makes you feel better, call it what it really is: a load of rubbish. So, if “enshittification” hasn’t made its way into your vocabulary yet, don’t worry—apparently, it hasn’t made its way into spellcheck either.This reflection has been inspired by an article by David Astie in SMH

This morning, in a moment of digital housekeeping, I opened my spam and junk folders, only to be greeted by an avalanche of Black Friday sales. Every subject line screamed urgency—“Last chance!” “Don’t miss out!” “Once-in-a-lifetime deals!”—and for a brief moment, I wondered if I might be throwing away the opportunity of a lifetime by hitting “delete all.” Spoiler: I wasn’t.Black Friday, for those who’ve somehow missed the annual frenzy, began in the United States as the day after Thanksgiving—a post-turkey marathon of shopping madness. The name originally referred to the chaos of traffic jams and overcrowded stores, but marketers swiftly spun it into something more lucrative: the start of the holiday shopping season, with deals designed to lure even the most budget conscious.But why stop there? In recent years, Black Friday has evolved from a single day to an entire season. We’ve got Cyber Monday, Black Friday Early Access, and “Extended Black Friday” sales that seem to stretch well into December. And thanks to the internet, those deals now land squarely in your inbox (or, in my case, my junk folder).As I deleted page after page of promotional emails, I had to wonder—are we all suffering from sale fatigue? How many deals can we ignore before they stop being deals? Maybe there’s something comforting about hitting delete and reclaiming a little bit of calm from the chaos.So, to those who braved the Black Friday madness online or in stores, I salute you. As for me, I’m sticking to my plan of decluttering—both my inbox and my shopping list. Because sometimes, the best deal is no deal at all.

Step into the foyer of Kiama Council chambers, and you’ll see an image that captures what this community treasures: on one side, a tranquil dairy farm, cows grazing against a backdrop of rolling green hills; on the other, the stunning coastline, waves crashing in a scene synonymous with Kiama’s identity. But let us take a closer look at this visual declaration of values. What does it mean when those cherished green hills are replaced by rooftops and cul-de-sacs?Kiama Council Foyer Urban expansion is inevitable, we are told, a consequence of population growth and the demand for housing. Yet, the way we grow is not inevitable, it’s shaped by choices we make as a community. Sprawl happens when we resist density. Many of us baulk at the idea of five storey apartments or high-density housing, preferring our towns to remain low and sprawling. But if we are not willing to go up, we must go out. And going out means developers will do what developers do best; seize the opportunity to turn farmland into subdivisions.Take the lush green paddocks west of Kiama, captured in the second image, where dairy cows roam. It’s a familiar, grounding sight. But here is the catch: a farmer does not own this land. It belongs to a developer, and this land lease exists on a handshake agreement. This arrangement speaks volumes about the precariousness of agricultural land in the face of urban pressure. It is not just a matter of time but of priorities. When the bulldozers come, the cows will be gone, and with them, a way of life.Spring Creek Looking South  This land is more than just a postcard-perfect view. It is part of a thriving dairy farm, feeding the next generation of cows who will produce milk for families and sustain livelihoods. Yet, within the next decade, it could be carved into blocks, another casualty of our resistance to reimagining how we live. When we trade pastures for pavement, what else do we lose? Not just milk production or the soothing sight of grazing cattle, but the ability to connect with the land that defines us.This is not a sentimental argument for preservation at all costs. Growth is necessary. People need homes. But let us acknowledge what we are trading away with every development approval. If we want to save our agricultural landscapes, we need to have honest conversations with each other about density and liveability. Four-storey apartments might feel unthinkable now, but are they more unthinkable than losing the very landscapes we cherish as the heart of our community?Kiama’s beaches will endure, but the dairy farms may not. The council’s foyer reminds us of what we value. Let us ensure those values guide us before it’s too late.

Australia has taken a bold leap, becoming the first country in the world to ban social media for children under 16. The Albanese government’s groundbreaking legislation passed the Senate late last night, aiming to shield young Australians from the darker corners of the digital world.The move comes amid growing concerns about the toxic nature of social media spaces. From relentless cyberbullying to unrealistic beauty standards and algorithm-driven rabbit holes, the online environment has become a minefield for young minds. Mental health experts point to rising rates of anxiety and depression, with many saying the damage begins early—and doesn’t stop.16 year old Alex Gordon, who started on social media when she was 12, doesn’t see the point in the ban. She believes the world has now evolved to being mostly online and to deprive youngsters of this world wouldn’t be fair.“Everything is on social media, that’s how you learn and meet people now. Adults are always saying you need to get out into the ‘real’ world, but social media is the real world now,” says Gordon.But it’s not just teens who are falling victim. Adults, often the loudest voices in these virtual spaces, set a poor example. Whether it's the spread of misinformation, public shaming, or vitriolic comment threads, the behaviour of grown-ups online has raised questions about whether they are equipped to be role models for the next generation.While the legislation enjoys broad support from major parties, critics remain. Tech giants like Meta and TikTok argue the law is impractical and risks pushing children onto more dangerous, unregulated platforms. Privacy advocates warn that age-verification systems, which may include biometric data, could pose new risks.Gordon cited the failure of the current age restrictions on social media, which don’t allow people below the age of 13 to use them, as proof that young people will still be able to find a way to use the sites.“You can’t really stop kids from being on social media, there was already an over 13 age restriction on it and there’s plenty of kids under 13 on social media,” says Gordon.Mental health experts are similarly divided. Dr Leah Andrews, a child psychologist, supports the ban but warns against a one-size-fits-all approach. “Kids need protection, but banning social media doesn’t address why it’s so toxic in the first place,” she said.With a year-long trial period ahead to finalise regulations, questions remain about how this ban will work in practice. Will it genuinely protect children, or just paper over deeper cultural issues?Australia has made history with this decision, but is banning children from social media enough when adults still struggle to behave responsibly online?

Kiama is a safe and thriving community, but the latest crime data reveals one area where we can all make a difference: car theft and theft from vehicles. This is one of the few offences where Kiama’s crime rate is higher than the NSW average, making it a clear priority for action.Theft from vehicles remains an ongoing issue, with simple mistakes like leaving cars unlocked or valuables visible creating easy opportunities for thieves. Many of these crimes are preventable, and by taking a few small steps, we can work together to reduce the numbers.Authorities have shared practical advice to help protect your vehicle and make Kiama a safer place:Lock your car every time, even when parked in your driveway or at home.Remove valuables like wallets, phones, or bags from view—out of sight means out of mind for thieves.Park in well-lit areas whenever possible to deter opportunistic crime.Install basic deterrents, such as steering wheel locks or dash cameras, which can make your car a less attractive target.Consider installing CCTV at your home or business to provide an added layer of security and deter potential offenders.While car theft is an area for improvement, Kiama’s crime rates for many other offences are impressively low:Break and enter – dwellings: This offence is uncommon in Kiama, with the area ranked 84th in NSW, well below the state average. Robbery: With a rank of 61st, robbery is rare in Kiama, making it one of the safest communities in this category.Stealing offences: Other stealing offences, such as shoplifting and petty theft, have decreased by almost 10% over the past decade, showing a long-term positive trend.Domestic violence-related assault: Kiama ranks 115th in the state, with significantly fewer cases compared to most NSW LGAs.These strong results reflect the community’s vigilance and proactive approach to safety.For more detailed statistics on crime trends in Kiama and NSW, visit the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR) at bocsar.nsw.gov.au. Their comprehensive data provides insights into offence types and trends, helping communities like ours stay informed and proactive.Let’s Take Action TogetherKiama has an opportunity to lead the way in community safety. Reducing car theft and theft from vehicles is something every resident can contribute to, and together we can make a real difference.What steps will you take to protect your car and your community? Let’s work together to ensure Kiama remains one of the safest places in NSW.

What if Kiama didn’t just consult? What if we truly co-designed its future - a bold, transformative vision that puts quality of life, innovation, and well-being at the centre?The report on the Council’s Draft Growth and Housing Strategy, discussed at the Ordinary Council Meeting on Wednesday, 20 November 2024, offers Kiama a chance to move beyond the ordinary. It’s an opportunity to rethink traditional approaches to housing and urban planning - and let’s face it, we need to. Kiama’s future demands more than ticking boxes and business as usual.Kiama’s residents are extraordinary. Whether tackling youth and male suicide, dementia care, or even placemaking, this community consistently punches well above its weight. We’re engaged, committed, and deeply passionate about our home.So why is it that so many residents stay silent during consultation processes? It’s not apathy, it’s exhaustion. People are tired of participating in systems where their voices seem to go nowhere. And that’s the real loss here - a loss of faith in being heard.Let’s name the problem: too often, housing solutions are stuck in a developer-led, middle-income-focused model. It’s a formula that prioritises a profit-centric housing model over well-being and narrows the field of possibilities.But around the world, communities like ours are breaking that mold. They’re pairing local knowledge with fresh funding models and innovative ideas. Think Birmingham’s IMPACT model, where councils, experts, and communities come together to co-design solutions that reflect local needs and values.This is our moment. Kiama’s residents are the urban stewards of this region, not here for a quick profit but for systemic innovation that uplifts well-being and builds a legacy for generations to come.If we’re serious about leading in housing and innovation, here’s what needs to happen:Wrap it up and roll it out: Finalise the housing strategy and take it to the community for real, meaningful consultation.Team up for success: Partner with state authorities and developers to align local priorities with regional opportunities.Set the clock ticking: Establish clear deadlines and deliver diverse, affordable housing options without delay.Engage, don’t just inform: Move from telling residents what’s happening to genuinely involving them, with transparent feedback loops that show how their input drives outcomes.This isn’t just about housing. It’s about who we are as a community. Do we want to stick with the same tired playbook or dare to reimagine what’s possible?The Draft Growth and Housing Strategy is a starting point, but it’s not enough on its own. Its success will depend on whether council and the community are ready to embrace change and collaborate meaningfully.Let’s make Kiama the benchmark for community-driven solutions and innovation. Because when Kiama cares, Kiama leads.

Kiama locals Jacqui Forst and Lynne Strong stepped into the hub of innovation and collaboration at the UNSW Business School's end-of-year reflections and celebrations this week. Hosted by Deputy Dean Karin Saunders, the event buzzed with energy as academics and industry leaders shared stories of partnerships that turn ideas into action. We were honoured to attend, not as passive observers but as active learners, keen to uncover opportunities that could enrich our community.The Business Insights Institute at UNSW champions an ethos we can all embrace—knocking on doors, learning the language, and building bridges between academics, industries, and communities. Their "inside-out" and "outside-in" approaches are models of engagement, where academics reach out to collaborate, and industry players knock back with ideas for partnership.Imagine this ethos in action here in the Kiama LGA. Our region is brimming with passionate community members, knowledgeable experts, and untapped potential for collaboration. Farmers innovating in sustainable agriculture, teachers nurturing the next generation, local business leaders navigating complex markets—these are the people we should be knocking on doors to meet.Jacqui and I attend events like this one at UNSW because we want to bring ideas home. Who else wants to collaborate? What can we learn from them? And most importantly, how can their expertise help our community tackle the challenges we face?One of the evening’s key themes was the importance of listening. Noel Harding, an academic with a background in industry, spoke about breaking down silos and improving communication between sectors. Sarah Dart, a Chief Customer Officer, highlighted the transformative potential of combining research insights with practical application in the workplace. And Professor Barney Tan reminded us of the power of centralised frameworks to bring diverse groups together to solve meaningful problems.For Kiama Council, the message is clear: we need to listen to our experts and our community. By reaching out to local leaders, tapping into the expertise of nearby universities, and fostering connections, we can create an ecosystem of shared knowledge. This isn’t just about solving problems—it’s about unlocking the creativity and resilience already present in our region.We don’t have to reinvent the wheel. As Deputy Dean Karin Saunders eloquently put it, every organisation has its own “house with many rooms,” full of people with ideas, skills, and lived experience. Our job is to knock on those doors and invite collaboration.Kiama LGA already has the building blocks for success. By learning from the UNSW model and embracing a partnership-first approach, we can create solutions that reflect the unique character and needs of our community. Let’s start by asking: Who in our backyard has the expertise we need? Who’s passionate about making a difference? Let’s knock, listen, and learn.Together, we can create a community where innovation thrives, and everyone has a seat at the table.

The housing crisis is real. The system is broken. But amidst the dysfunction is an opportunity to create a planning process that works for everyone—not just developers, not just governments, but the communities that will live with the outcomes.Last week, the Minns Government announced a state-led planning body to bypass councils for developments over $60 million in Sydney and $30 million in the regions. The backlash was swift. “Local councils and communities, sidelined. Developers, green-lit.” came the cry. But what if we flipped the narrative? What if this moment could bring everyone to the table—not just three levels of government, but the community itself?Opinion by Lynne StrongLocal Government NSW President Cr Darriea Turley AM hit the nail on the head: “The housing crisis is multifaceted and requires all three spheres of government working together.” She’s right, but this isn’t just about governments. It’s about recognising the power of the community, the people who will live in these developments and the neighbours they will impact.Take inspiration from Birmingham’s IMPACT initiative, where community engagement is embedded into planning and decision-making. By combining research, practice, and lived experience, Birmingham has shown that trust and collaboration lead to better outcomes. Why couldn’t Kiama Council take a similar approach? Why couldn’t Kiama set the benchmark for first-class community engagement?This isn’t just about slamming developers or councils. It’s about rebuilding trust. Development applications languish for years. Councils are under-resourced. Residents feel locked out. Yet, change is possible when people feel heard. Kiama could lead by embracing participatory planning, giving residents real agency in shaping their future.The housing crisis demands bold solutions. But bold doesn’t mean excluding the voices that matter most. Let’s make this broken system the foundation for something better—together.

As the NSW Government moves forward with its review of the regulatory framework for short-term rental accommodation (STRA), State Member for Kiama Gareth Ward MP has highlighted the importance of community input on this complex issue. “I’m very excited to hear the community wants to provide feedback around short-term rental accommodation,” Ward stated. “I look forward to hearing the outcomes of the forum at Gerringong Town Hall on 5 December 2024 at 7:30 pm and would be more than happy to pass these views onto the Minister responsible.”Ward acknowledges the two-sided nature of the STRA debate. On one hand, he recognises concerns that short-term rentals reduce housing availability for locals and contribute to noise disturbances. On the other hand, he emphasises the economic benefits. “Without larger hotel accommodation like the Central Coast, short-term accommodation fuels our local economy and generates jobs and employment. Many of our small businesses rely on tourism, and short-term letting brings a high-value, low-volume tourist.”Finding a balanced solution is challenging. “We need to balance the various interests—from homes for locals to jobs for locals, and there is no one simple solution,” Ward remarked. His stance supports the idea of requiring a Development Application (DA) for short-term letting. “A DA consent condition could address issues like noise, and if owners don’t have clear rules or if these rules are repeatedly broken, the DA could be cancelled, and the property prohibited from short-term accommodation use.”Ward’s comments align with the NSW Government’s broader review of the STRA regulatory framework, which began in early 2024 with extensive community and industry consultations. The government sought public feedback through workshops, a discussion paper, and an online questionnaire, gathering over 430 submissions and 2,400 survey responses from councils, booking platforms, property owners, and the tourism sector.According to a NSW Government statement, “The feedback received will help ensure we strike the right balance between the benefits of short-term rental accommodation and the need to encourage more long-term rental options.”The NSW Government is considering this feedback alongside other housing initiatives announced in the 2024-25 Budget, including:$5.1 billion to build 8,400 new social homes.$1 billion to repair 33,500 existing social homes.$655.1 million for key worker accommodation in metro areas and rural health worker housing.$555.5 million to expedite the planning system and housing infrastructure.$527.6 million for emergency housing and homelessness support.In tandem with these initiatives, new rental laws aim to enhance tenant protections, including ending no-grounds evictions, increasing notice periods, and introducing a Portable Rental Bonds Scheme to ease tenant mobility between properties.As the community awaits further updates, Ward’s commitment to represent the views of Kiama residents underscores the importance of local input in shaping a balanced approach to short-term accommodation that supports both the tourism economy and the need for long-term housing.To learn more about the review of STRA and the public feedback, visit the NSW Planning Portal.

Opinion by Lynne StrongAs individuals, our voices may seem small, easily lost in the noise of bureaucracy and decision-making. Yet, when we come together, our collective strength can be transformative. In our local communities, where development and planning decisions impact everything from liveability to affordability, the power of unity has never been more crucial.The recent announcement by the NSW Government to streamline development approvals has opened the door for us all to realise this. By challenging the long-held control of councils over these processes, the state government has not only addressed inefficiencies but also created a space for broader conversations about how development should be managed. This shift reminds us that when systems are challenged, so too is the silence that often stifles dissenting voices.Too often, single voices—calling out inefficiencies, advocating for transparency, or questioning decisions—are silenced or dismissed. It’s a lonely and disheartening experience. But this announcement shows us that change is possible, and it invites us to think about how much more we could achieve if those voices united. Together, we can amplify the wants and needs of the broader community, demanding processes that prioritise people over politics, ensure sustainable growth, and protect the character of our towns and regions.When we speak collectively, we speak from a place of authority, drawing on the shared knowledge and experiences of our community. This solidarity not only strengthens our voice but also insulates us from the fear of reprisal. Unified, we cannot be ignored. We create a force capable of holding decision-makers accountable, shaping policies that reflect the real needs of the people they serve.This announcement has shown that when inefficiencies are exposed, change can follow. Whether it’s about ensuring transparency in planning processes, advocating for affordable housing, or preserving the essence of our communities, our combined voices can create the change we want to see. Let’s seize this moment and speak out—together.

Let’s be real. We’ve all been there. Driving down Jamberoo Road, mind wandering to the never-ending to-do list—pick up the kids, finish that work report, grab dinner—and suddenly, we’re doing 90 in an 80 zone. It feels effortless. Our cars are built for speed; we’re cruising, listening to the radio, and then BAM. News drops that the speed limit is going down to 60 km/h. And suddenly, it’s an outrage.People launch petitions, local MPs jump on board to get things reversed, and we all start yelling about how ridiculous it is. But why? Why, when we all know that speed kills, are we so hell-bent on fighting something that’s meant to save lives?I’ll tell you why. It’s because slowing down is hard.It’s not just about the inconvenience of taking a bit longer to get from A to B. It’s deeper than that. Slowing down forces us to concentrate. Driving is no longer an easy, thoughtless task. We have to be aware of every sign, every curve, every pedestrian. And let’s be honest, a lot of the time, we’re not paying that much attention.In a world where we’re expected to be faster, more efficient, always on the go, having to drop from 80 (or let’s face it, probably 90) down to 60 feels like a punishment. Our cars are built to do 260 km/h! And yet, we’re being told to dawdle along at what feels like a snail’s pace. It feels unfair.But here’s the thing, it’s not about us. It’s about saving lives. It's about making sure someone isn’t getting that gut-wrenching call that a loved one won’t be coming home.We know the stats. We’ve seen the campaigns. We’ve heard the stories. Speed kills. A reduction in speed means fewer accidents, fewer deaths. It’s simple. Yet here we are, fighting it tooth and nail because we think it’s someone else’s job to fix the problem. We want better roads. We want more overtaking lanes. We want someone else to sort out the bicycle riders and the tourists. Anything but us having to change.No one wants to put anyone else’s life at risk. We don’t get in the car thinking, “Today I’m going to endanger lives.” We just don’t. But we also don’t want to do the hard thing, the thing that forces us to focus, to pay attention, to slow down when everything in our lives tells us to speed up.Maybe that’s why we’re so quick to sign a petition. We convince ourselves that this isn’t the solution, that it’s unnecessary, that the stats don’t apply to us. Because let’s face it—who really wants to admit that we’re part of the problem?It’s not easy. It takes effort to adjust, to slow down, to concentrate more. But what’s the alternative? More accidents? More people grieving their loved ones? More lives cut short because we wanted to shave a minute off our commute.So, yes, it’s hard. But it’s worth it. And maybe it’s time we stopped signing petitions and started looking at the bigger picture. Because at the end of the day, no one’s going to argue that a life saved wasn’t worth slowing down for.-Opinion by Lynne Strong

I don’t hold a degree in journalism, and while I scored in the top 1% for English in the HSC, I’ve never considered that achievement a defining marker of my career. At best, it was proof that, for one brief moment, I could meet an examiner’s expectations. Oddly enough, instead of following that path, I chose a science-based degree at university. Now, as a person in their late sixties, I find myself reconnecting with the part of me that existed at 18, that young person who had a drive to express their values, communicate clearly, and—hopefully—contribute to meaningful change.At this stage in life, I've traded in traditional credentials for something I value even more: a clear voice, a passion for justice, and a commitment to my community. I am not a journalist, but I have a desire to use whatever tools I can to amplify voices and perspectives often overshadowed or misunderstood. This journey has brought me back to writing, not as a career milestone but as a path to share thoughts and advocate for change.In a way, my lack of a traditional journalism background feels like a strength. I’m not confined by rigid structures or prescribed formulas; instead, I can engage directly with issues that matter to me, particularly those around social justice, environmental advocacy, and community-building. Every article or post I create is an opportunity to speak authentically, reaching others who may feel the same pull toward positive change.In essence, I consider myself a “values-based communicator.” This title resonates with my desire to express principles that matter, to bridge divides, and to build a more understanding world. It’s not about the credentials I lack; it’s about the passion and purpose I bring to my words. I hope that sharing these thoughts will inspire others who, like me, feel called to use their voice—even if they, too, don’t quite fit the traditional mould.

Ebony Wilson didn’t grow up in dairy farming; her journey began when she met her husband, Tom, a third-generation dairy farmer from a well-known local family. Tom’s family farm, however, didn’t have room for him to join, so Ebony and Tom are making their own way in the industry. Despite the challenges, Ebony’s passion has only deepened, turning what started as an unexpected path into a calling.“When I first got involved, it wasn’t just a job. It was a lifestyle, a passion,” Ebony reflects. “I’ve been doing this for over a decade now, and it still feels like there’s always something new to learn. I love my cows—they’re everything to me. ”For Ebony and other young women in dairy, technology is more than just a convenience; it’s a way to improve the farm and future-proof their operations. Though her current farm doesn’t have the latest tools, Ebony’s admiration for tech-driven solutions is unmistakable. She speaks with enthusiasm about the radio frequency identification devices (RFID) used for cow health monitoring, heat detection, automatic drafting, and apps that help with breeding.“Even though we don’t use a lot of the new tech on the farm, I’m fascinated by it,” she says. “The RFID collar system, for example - allows you to see exactly what’s going on with the cows, even when you’re not there. It’s amazing to know you’ll have the right information when you wake up for morning milking.”The DataGene Good Bulls app has also become a cornerstone in her work, allowing her to select bulls based on specific traits, a tool that helps farmers match breeding choices to herd needs. “I was looking for something to help me keep track of my heifers and came across the app,” she laughs. “Now, I can pick the best bulls to improve specific traits —it’s like designing the perfect herd!”For Ebony and Tom, the dream of having their own farm is as strong as ever. But the road to that dream is challenging, especially with the high cost of land and limited leasing opportunities. Tom has been working as a contractor on other farms, while Ebony has been building her own small herd, one calf at a time.“We’re always on the hunt for leasing opportunities, but it’s tough,” Ebony says. “Tom and I, we work so hard, and we know we’d make a great team if we had our own place. Until then, we’re just putting everything we have into building our future, cow by cow.”Ebony sees more young women getting involved in dairy than ever before, and she feels proud to be part of this shift. “There’s an old-fashioned mentality that maybe girls shouldn’t be here, but times are changing. I see more women in the industry than men sometimes, and it’s great to see the girls getting involved.”Her story is one of grit and vision, with women at the forefront of advancing dairy. Alongside friends and workmates like Kate Bourke and Charley Heyblok, Ebony is creating her own path, one that combines tradition with modern technology. These young women aren’t just tending cows; they’re learning the genetics, the data, and the intricacies that shape a thriving herd.“If I had the chance, I’d love to invest in genetic technology, embryo transfers, and those types of innovations,” she says with a smile. “To think we can design a herd that’s perfect for our environment—it’s just incredible. And that’s where I see the future of dairy.”The challenges of high land costs and limited access are real, but Ebony’s optimism shines through. She hopes that new partnerships with milk companies, supermarkets or local initiatives will help young farmers like her and Tom.Jamie Hamilton, her current boss, is exploring ways to engage milk companies in investing in farmland so young farmers can lease it.“We have a lot of people supporting us,” Ebony shares. “It’s not an easy path, but we’re part of a community that wants us to succeed. That’s what keeps us going.”With every calf and every advancement in technology, Ebony and her peers are redefining dairy farming. This new generation of women, driven by resilience, passion, and a love for technology, is shaping the future of the industry—one farm, one herd, and one new idea at a time.

As NSW councils face growing calls for transparency and accountability, former Kiama Councillor Karen Renkema-Lang has urged reforms that extend beyond councillor conduct to include all council officials, including senior staff. Her submission to the NSW Office of Local Government’s review of the Councillor Conduct Framework highlights that misconduct isn’t confined to elected officials.This call for greater accountability aligns with recent upheaval at Shoalhaven Council. Shoalhaven City Council CEO Robyn Stevens recently resigned amid reported conflicts with Mayor Patricia White and other councillors. Stevens’ resignation, allegedly following pressure from council members, may trigger further high-level resignations and raised serious concerns about workplace culture and accountability among council leadership.Renkema-Lang argues that the NSW Government’s review should not be limited to councillor conduct. “It’s not just councillors who behave badly,” she stated. “An internet search reveals many instances of senior Council staff acting inappropriately or engaging in corrupt conduct, even fraud. The scope of the review needs to cover complaint management for all council officials to ensure it is managed consistently and holistically.”Renkema-Lang’s perspective resonates with experiences at Shoalhaven. Former Shoalhaven Councillor Professor Tonia Gray recently spoke about the challenges of speaking out within a culture that she described as “toxic” and intimidating. Her presentation at the Berry Ignite Festival highlighted incidents of online harassment and defamation threats used to silence dissenting voices, illustrating the persistent issues council officials face in such environments.According to reports Stevens’ departure from Shoalhaven Council followed a tense “ambush” meeting with Mayor White and other councillors regarding her employment. This action brought into focus the power dynamics in councils, where senior staff can face termination without grounds, resulting in costly severance payouts and a disrupted work environment.The Shoalhaven situation reflects Renkema-Lang’s concerns about unchecked power within council structures. She warned against the proposed expansion of mayoral powers, which would allow mayors to expel councillors from meetings and impose financial penalties. "Giving mayors this authority creates a largely unchecked avenue for abuse,” Renkema-Lang cautioned, noting that mayors already wield considerable influence over council operations.The experiences of Renkema-Lang, Gray, and Stevens suggest that the issues go beyond councillor behaviour, pointing to a broader cultural problem within local councils. Gray, in her Berry Ignite presentation, described the “blood sport” nature of council politics and the weaponisation of defamation threats, which often isolate or intimidate those who speak up.Both Kiama and Shoalhaven examples underscore Renkema-Lang’s push for reform that includes Safework NSW standards and fraud prevention policies as benchmarks for council conduct. She proposes a unified framework that holds all council officials accountable and supports the proposal to replace private investigators with independent committees for more objective oversight. As a further measure of transparency, she advocates for public access to councillor briefing sessions rather than banning them outright.As Shoalhaven seeks stability after Stevens’ resignation, it serves as a reminder that transparency, oversight, and consistent standards are essential in rebuilding public trust. Renkema-Lang’s recommendations and the lessons from Shoalhaven offer NSW councils an opportunity to create a more resilient, accountable local government framework.In Renkema-Lang’s words, “If we want real accountability in our councils, we need councillors and council officials alike to demonstrate higher standards of integrity and better behaviour.” Shoalhaven’s recent challenges and insights from advocates like Renkema-Lang and Gray suggest a broader, more inclusive approach to governance reform is crucial for councils to truly serve their communities.

Gerringong’s South Precinct is calling on residents to discuss the growing impact of short-term rental accommodation (STRA) on local communities. Scheduled for 7:30 pm on December 5 at the Gerringong Town Hall, this meeting will provide a platform for locals across the Kiama Local Government Area (LGA) to share experiences and voice concerns about the rapid expansion of non-hosted STRA, particularly through platforms like Airbnb.In recent years, coastal communities like Kiama have seen an influx of STRA listings, with up to 6.5% of housing stock dedicated to short-term rentals. In 2021 in Kiama alone, 498 properties were registered as STRA, with the largest concentrations in Kiama and Gerroa, followed by Gerringong, Werri Beach, and Kiama Downs. The community is concerned that STRA’s are transforming formerly quiet neighbourhoods into bustling, high-occupancy tourist zones. Once family homes some now accommodate groups of 10 or more people, far exceeding their original residential intent.STR listing “density” in Kiama in 2018 was 6 times the Australian average Source Sydney University 2018Residents are alarmed, especially as some STRA properties are purpose-built to function as high-occupancy tourist accommodations. As one South Precinct member stated, “We bought homes in a residential area, not expecting businesses and hotels as neighbours.”Kiama Council has also expressed concern over this shift, particularly when new developments, approved as residential properties, are marketed as tourist rentals upon completion. In a submission to the NSW Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, the Council noted the troubling trend of residential housing increasingly being repurposed for short-term tourist stays, which, over time, reduces the availability of permanent housing and drives up costs for local families.Source Kiama Council Report Evidence Base Short Term Rental Accommodation Across NSW, eight councils have implemented various restrictions on STRA, from capping the number of days non-hosted rentals can operate to requiring special permits and enforcing stricter compliance. Can Kiama Council consider similar measures—such as introducing a day limit for non-hosted STRA or requiring mandatory registration and annual fees? Could this offer residents some relief and discourage investors who prioritise profit over community well-being?The NSW Fair Trading Code of Conduct for the STRA industry outlines responsibilities for hosts, guests, and booking platforms, including occupancy limits, noise regulations, and penalties for non-compliance. However, local residents report limited monitoring of this code, with disturbances from overcrowded, noisy STRA properties often left unchecked. The community meeting will discuss ways to navigate this Code and how it could be enforced more effectively to protect local neighbourhoods.What You Can DoResidents are encouraged to attend the South Precinct meeting to:Voice Concerns: Share experiences about noise, overcrowding, and safety issues related to STRA.Discuss Solutions: Explore how local council or state government actions could address the rising density of STRA in residential areas.Understand Regulations: Learn about the Code of Conduct and discuss ways to ensure better compliance.“Politics is the Art of the Possible” This meeting isn’t just for those immediately affected, it's for everyone who wants to learn what is in council’s control and who we can lobby for change —anyone within the Kiama LGA is encouraged to participate, as proactive engagement can help prevent future disruptions in all neighbourhoods. With STRA affecting housing, affordability, and quality of life, action is crucial. The meeting offers a valuable opportunity to gather community input, with the aim of supporting the council in future decisions to balance tourism and community needs.