If there’s one thing I know for sure, it’s this: good mental health and real wellbeing rely on a sense of agency—on knowing that we have a voice and that it matters. And yet, every time I see people rallying around a political “saviour” who promises to solve it all for them, I get a knot in my stomach. When we hand over our hope to a single figure, we’re also handing over a part of ourselves, trusting them to “fix” things. It’s a setup that can leave people feeling powerless, waiting instead of doing.And if the recent US election has taught us anything, it’s that many Americans are looking for just such a “saviour”—someone who can single-handedly restore their vision of a better life. But here in Australia, we need to ask ourselves: how do we avoid falling into that same trap? How can we steer clear of a mentality that hands over our hopes, our voices, and even our power to a single figure?The answer lies in building a culture of grounded, realistic trust—one that’s rooted in community, shared responsibility, and genuine accountability. Here’s where we can start:1. Focus on Community Over Hero WorshipAustralia has always prided itself on mateship, a spirit of looking out for one another and standing together. Instead of looking to leaders to “save” us, we can look to our communities and strengthen the connections that make us resilient. When communities work together to tackle local issues, it builds a stronger, more empowered society that doesn’t rely on anyone swooping in to solve our problems.2. Support Leaders Who Empower, Not Just PromiseReal leadership doesn’t just tell us what we want to hear—it empowers us to make changes ourselves. We need leaders who inspire us to get involved, who emphasise collaboration over top-down solutions, and who work alongside us, not above us. When we choose leaders who see their role as serving, rather than rescuing, we build a culture that values agency over passivity.3. Invest in Education for Critical ThinkingTo avoid saviour syndrome, we need to be able to spot the difference between rhetoric and substance. Schools, libraries, and media literacy programs should prioritise teaching Australians to think critically, ask questions, and recognise when promises are unrealistic or hollow. When people are equipped to make informed decisions, they’re less likely to hand over their trust to the loudest voice in the room.4. Celebrate Accountability and TransparencyA true leader is accountable. Let’s highlight and support leaders who don’t shy away from transparency, who admit when they’re wrong, and who are clear about both their successes and challenges. By valuing accountability over charisma, we make it clear that leadership is about integrity, not just persuasion.5. Build a Culture of Shared ResponsibilityReal change isn’t about one person fixing everything; it’s about everyone doing their part. By fostering a culture of shared responsibility, we create a sense of purpose and agency that empowers people to engage with their communities, contribute to solutions, and take ownership of our collective future. When people feel their actions matter, they’re less likely to place all their hopes on one figure.6. Encourage Local Solutions to Local ProblemsNational leaders may set the tone, but often, it’s local communities that drive real change. We can strengthen our local councils, community organisations, and neighbourhood initiatives, supporting solutions that address the specific needs of each region. By focusing on local action, we’re reminded that real solutions often come from within, not above.The lesson from the US election is clear: putting our faith in a “saviour” to fix everything is not only a recipe for disappointment; it risks giving away our own power. In Australia, we have the chance to foster a different culture—one that’s grounded in connection, collaboration, and a belief in collective effort. When we avoid the saviour mentality, we create a stronger, more resilient Australia that trusts in itself, not in empty promises.

Well, here we are again. Donald Trump has made his way back to the White House, and let’s just say, it’s not exactly the feel-good twist many of us were hoping for. It’s like the sequel we didn’t ask for but got anyway. But before we all brace ourselves for another political rollercoaster, let’s take a moment to remember something: we get to decide what kind of life we lead.The constant stream of political news can be exhausting, no doubt. But as someone who contributes to The Bugle, I’m here to say that while it’s important to stay informed, it’s also okay to step back and focus on the kind of news that brings you joy, whether that’s stories about community, innovation, or nature’s resilience. We can take charge of our focus, tuning into what uplifts us, while also setting boundaries for our own well-being. Try looking at our Faces of the Coast in our features column on the app. Here’s my personal list for getting back to the heart of what really matters. I hope it inspires a bit of lightness for those feeling weighed down by the latest news cycle:See more sunrises: Capture the small, quiet moments that bring joy. Early mornings or late evenings offer those pockets of stillness that let us reflect and reconnect with our surroundings. Wake up early, catch that sunrise, and listen to the sounds of our village waking up.Turn off the News: We all need a little break from the headlines at times, even those of us in the media. Use that time to explore things that lift your spirits: try something new, read that book gathering dust, or just go outside for a breath of fresh air. At the same time, stay open to positive local stories in The Bugle—those gems that highlight the good happening around us and bring a little more joy.Save for experiences, not stuff: Instead of eyeing the latest tech gadget, consider investing in memories. This year, I’m committed to putting my savings toward experiences—travelling to new places, meeting people, and making memories. These are the things that outlast any news cycle and add real richness to life.Get involved, where it counts: We can have the biggest impact right here in our own backyard. Join a local group, volunteer, support our community, and channel your energy toward what really matters. This is how we make a difference, bit by bit.Laugh, especially when it’s hard: Let’s face it—the world feels absurd at times. Embrace the humour, find the light-hearted moments, and remember that laughing is a form of resilience. Humour is, quite often, the best medicine, especially in times like these.Connect with people: When everything feels polarised and distant, go out of your way to reach out to friends, family, and neighbours. These connections keep us grounded and remind us that we’re part of something greater than ourselves.So yes, Trump’s back in the White House. But that’s not our story. Let’s keep our focus close to home—on the people, places, and experiences that give our lives richness and meaning. Life keeps moving forward, and so can we, no matter who’s in office.-Opinion piece by Lynne Strong

I’ll admit it: I’m going to a Melbourne Cup luncheon—not because I’m a racing enthusiast, or I have a vested interest in fascinators but for the chance to meet people and catch up with friends. When I invited a few others, two of them gave a firm, polite "no," explaining that horse racing doesn’t align with their values. And I thought kudos to them!There’s something refreshing about people who make decisions based on principles. It reminded me how small, simple actions can bring our values to life without needing a megaphone. Social justice doesn’t have to mean shouting in the streets (though, sometimes, that’s necessary too). For those of us looking to make a difference in quieter ways, here are a few ideas:Make your dollars count by choosing ethical businesses. Even small purchases matter, and by supporting brands with fair practices, you nudge things in the right direction. And while we’re all glued to our screens, let’s use social media to amplify voices on issues we care about. Avoid tokenistic posting, and instead share thoughtfully to inform and engage others. It might even spark productive conversation.You can also make a difference by supporting local groups that align with your values.There are plenty of ways to make an impact without much effort, from donating blood to the Red Cross (a single donation can save up to three lives!) to volunteering with Meals on Wheels, where just an hour or two helps deliver meals to elderly neighbours. For those who want to get outside, Landcare runs local conservation projects—think tree planting and park clean-ups—that keep our green spaces thriving. Organisations like Little Free Pantries let us add a few non-perishable items to stock community shelves whenever we can. It’s proof that sometimes, the smallest actions bring the biggest impact!Learning and listening are powerful too. None of us know everything, but by reading widely on issues like homelessness, affordable housing or environmental justice, we become more informed, and it’s easier to live out our values in everyday choices.And don’t underestimate the ripple effect of small actions within your circle. So, next time you’re faced with an invitation that doesn’t feel quite right, remember that it’s okay to say “no” when it matters. And if you’re a “yes” like me, you can still bring your values along for the ride.#SocialJustice #CommunityAction #MakeADifference #GivingBack #VolunteerOpportunities #BloodDonation #MealsOnWheels #Landcare #ShareTheDignity #LittleFreePantries #SmallActionsBigImpact #CommunitySupport #DoGood #HelpingHands

In a media landscape dominated by national narratives, local newspapers like The Bugle stand apart, giving voice to the everyday stories that matter most to their communities. They aren’t just news outlets; they’re the heartbeat of regional life, capturing moments and movements that bigger publications often miss.While our recent wins at the Country Press NSW Awards have been cause for celebration, they also underscore something bigger: local newspapers are more vital than ever. They bring together people who might otherwise never meet, celebrate stories that don’t make the evening news, and provide a platform where communities can discuss, debate, and define their identity. In times of political campaigns or crises, it’s these papers that offer a nuanced look at what’s truly happening in small towns and rural areas. Without them, many community stories would simply go untold, lost in the static of broader media.Local newspapers are also launching pads for budding journalists who cut their teeth on stories about council decisions, cultural events, or high school sports achievements. These journalists learn that every headline matters, no matter how small the audience might seem. By covering stories from the ground up, they hone the art of storytelling in a way that prioritises connection and community over clicks.More than just informing, papers like The Bugle strengthen the bonds between neighbours. They celebrate what makes each town unique and spotlight the people who work tirelessly to keep communities vibrant. This, at its core, is what sets regional papers apart. They remind us that every story has value when it comes to giving a voice to our quiet achievers. Local newspapers aren’t just about reporting news; they are about fostering connections, amplifying voices, and preserving the rich tapestry of local life.At a time when the world feels more disconnected than ever, let’s support our local papers. For many readers, these aren’t just articles; they’re affirmations that their stories matter.

For local dairy farmers, grain prices are always a critical concern, as the region’s farming systems rely on grain and grain by-products for between 25% and 50% of their feed. Recent forecasts show a steep decline in grain and oilseed production—down 43% in South Australia and 35% in Victoria compared to the previous year—raising fears that grain prices would increase significantly, putting further pressure on already tight margins.However, according to local consultant Dr. Neil Moss, “Even though we’ve had a poor crop in some states, other major grain-producing regions, particularly New South Wales and Southern Queensland, are looking good. This will likely lead to lower grain prices and be beneficial to our farmers."This mixed outlook means that while South Australia and Victoria are facing significant production losses, farmers in regions with stronger crops may not feel the same financial strain. "We're not overly concerned about grain prices at the moment,” Moss adds.While uncertainty remains, especially with fluctuating weather conditions, the outlook for pasture conditions is promising in most dairying regions. “With the exception of the Bega Valley, where it’s very dry, we’re seeing good pasture conditions locally. ” says Moss. This, combined with favourable grain prices, offers an optimistic picture for local dairy farmers.As farmers watch the markets closely, the ability to adapt remains key. Lower grain prices may provide much-needed relief, but long-term sustainability will depend on a variety of factors—access to land for long term leasing, milk production, prices, and climate conditions among them. 

The recent decision by Transport for NSW to reduce the speed limit on Jamberoo Road to 60 km/h has stirred up quite the debate in our community. Concerns about safety, wildlife, fines, and inconvenience have all been voiced, particularly as MP Gareth Ward has launched a petition to reverse the decision, citing doubts about the effectiveness of the speed reduction. While we all want safer roads, finding the right balance between efficient commuting and protecting lives is no easy task.What’s clear, however, is that road safety isn’t just about speed limits—it’s also about how we design and manage our roads. In fact, across the world, countries are adopting innovative, eye-catching measures to encourage safer driving and protect pedestrians. Here’s a look at some of the most fascinating traffic calming devices from around the globe, and how they could complement the speed limit reduction debate here in Australia.1. 3D Pedestrian Crossings (Iceland)Perhaps one of the most visually striking ideas comes from Iceland, where pedestrian crossings are painted in a way that makes them appear three-dimensional. This optical illusion slows down drivers who instinctively reduce their speed, thinking the crosswalk blocks are hovering above the road. While Australia hasn’t yet adopted this eye-catching solution, it could be a fun and effective way to improve safety in high-risk areas, especially in tourist-heavy zones where drivers might not be as familiar with the roads.Iceland 3D pedestrian crossings. Photo Credit Maria Pellini2. Illuminated Crosswalks (South Korea)South Korea has taken pedestrian safety to the next level by installing illuminated crosswalks. These crossings light up at night, making pedestrians far more visible to drivers. Some even feature motion sensors that detect people approaching, activating flashing lights to warn drivers to slow down. 3. Speed Bump Crosswalks (Spain)In Spain, pedestrian crossings are sometimes raised, effectively turning them into speed bumps. Drivers must slow down to navigate these crossings, while pedestrians benefit from the added visibility. In Australia, we have speed bumps and road humps as common traffic calming devices but integrating them into pedestrian crossings in busy areas like Jamberoo and Gerringong Villages could enhance safety without causing major delays for drivers.4. Musical Roads (Japan)Japan has developed a unique way to encourage safe driving: roads that ‘sing’ when cars travel at the correct speed. Known as ‘melody roads,’ grooves in the road surface produce musical notes when driven over at a specific speed, providing an enjoyable incentive for drivers to stay within the limit. While this might seem whimsical, it’s an intriguing example of how creativity can be used to influence driver behaviour—perhaps something similar could be trialled on stretches of road known for speeding issues in Australia.5. Colourful Crosswalks (Mexico)In Mexico, some crosswalks have been transformed into vibrant works of art. These colourful, patterned crosswalks not only make roads more attractive but also serve as a visual reminder to slow down. This creative approach to traffic calming could add charm to areas like Jamberoo, Gerringong and Kiama, offering both residents and tourists a safer and more engaging experience on the roads.Current Measures in AustraliaAustralia already employs a number of traffic calming measures, such as speed bumps, roundabouts, chicanes, and rumble strips, all designed to control speed and improve safety. These devices are particularly effective in school zones and residential areas where pedestrian activity is high.In Kiama, we have implemented traditional traffic calming devices like roundabouts and pedestrian refuges, but as seen in the examples above, we could benefit from even more innovative measures. The current reduction in speed limits on Jamberoo Road is an important step in improving safety, but it doesn’t have to be the only one. A holistic approach, incorporating better signage, creative road designs, and enhanced pedestrian visibility, would go a long way in making our roads safer for everyone.Looking ForwardThe pushback against the speed limit reduction on Jamberoo Road highlights a broader issue: change can be difficult, and not everyone will immediately see the benefit. But as we’ve seen from these global examples, innovative, engaging, and even fun solutions can help make our roads safer without creating a sense of inconvenience.If the 60 km/h limit saves just one life, the small inconvenience it causes is surely worth it. By combining thoughtful road design, creative measures, and an evidence-based approach to speed limits, we can protect our community and create safer roads for all.It’s time we looked beyond just speed limits and embraced a more innovative approach to road safety—one that balances convenience with the protection of life.

Opinion by Lynne Strong As the results of the Kiama council election settle, the message is clear: our community has chosen a path focused on the greater good, not personal agendas or divisive politics. There’s hope that the newly elected councillors will bring much-needed collaboration and integrity to the table.While the councillors have yet to prove themselves, the election marks a shift towards unity, where long-term solutions, innovation, and fiscal responsibility must take priority. As Zora Neale Hurston wrote, “There are years that ask questions and years that answer.” Now, Kiama needs answers.Across Australia, we’ve seen elections where controversial figures, like Andrew Thaler in the Snowy Monaro Region, have gained seats on local councils. Thaler’s campaign tactics leaned on stirring conflict and driving wedges between people, a style that echoes populist politics seen in the US focused more on tearing others down than fostering cooperation.By contrast, Kiama’s councillors were elected on a platform of working together and focusing on what really matters—housing affordability, fiscal responsibility, and infrastructure. Tackling these issues will take a balanced approach, with councillors who listen to different perspectives, engage with the community, and focus on real solutions.This election serves as a reminder that voting matters. Our community has set the tone, but it’s up to us to hold our representatives accountable, ensuring that promises turn into action. By fostering respect and collaboration, we can build a council that represents the best of Kiama.The road ahead won’t be easy, but there’s optimism. Let’s support our councillors as they work to tackle the challenges ahead, and together, ensure Kiama thrives.

Opinion piece by Lynne Strong The recent decision by Transport for NSW to reduce the speed limit on Jamberoo Road to 60 km/h has sparked a mixed response in our community. Kiama MP Gareth Ward, responding to considerable feedback from concerned residents, has launched a petition to reinstate the 80 km/h speed limit, citing concerns that the reduction won’t improve safety and will result in fines for local commuters.While Mr Ward’s concerns about the impact on residents are understandable, it is crucial to remember that decisions like these are made with community safety in mind. Politicians are often caught between responding to immediate feedback and making choices for the long-term good. The reduction in speed limits on Jamberoo Road should be seen not as an inconvenience but as an essential measure to saving lives. Reducing speed limits is not a knee-jerk reaction; it’s backed by extensive research. Numerous studies have shown that lower speed limits directly lead to fewer accidents. According to the World Health Organization, a 5% reduction in average speed can result in a 30% decrease in fatal crashes. On roads where speed limits are reduced from 80 km/h to 60 km/h, the number of accidents drops by 25–40%.Jamberoo Road, like many rural roads, is frequently shared by cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. The lower speed limit gives drivers more time to react and significantly reduces the severity of accidents when they do occur. While Mr Ward is right that maintenance and roadworks are critical, lowering the speed limit is one of the most effective measures we can take to make this road safer for everyone. The decision to reduce the speed limit along Jamberoo Road will add just 1 minute and 39 seconds to the average commute — a minor inconvenience when weighed against the potential life-saving benefits. Many of us have loved ones in this community, and none of us want them to become a statistic on our roads. If lowering the speed limit by a small margin helps protect them, then it’s a step worth taking. It’s natural to be concerned about fines or small delays, the real question should be: What is the cost of doing nothing? The risk of serious accidents and fatalities far outweighs the extra minute added to the journey. One area where Australia could certainly improve is in its signage reminding drivers of speed limits. While travelling in Spain, I noticed impressive signage that serves as a constant reminder of the speed limits, helping to keep drivers aware of the road rules. It’s not just about reducing speeds but also about making sure motorists are consistently aware of their surroundings. This is definitely something that could be implemented more effectively in Australia to support safer driving habits. Mr Ward’s call for additional road works and better overtaking options is certainly valid. These are important components of improving road safety, and they should work in tandem with speed reductions, not as an alternative. A holistic approach that includes infrastructure improvements, better signage, and lower speeds will create the safest possible environment for all road users.However, focusing solely on issues like tourist and motorcyclist behaviour, as Mr Ward suggests, misses the broader point. Speed limits affect everyone, and slower speeds give all drivers more time to react, reducing the likelihood of fatal accidents. At the heart of this debate is our shared goal: to ensure that our roads are safe for everyone. While it’s understandable that Mr Ward, like many politicians, may feel the pressure of public feedback, it’s important to remember that road safety is not about popularity—it’s about protecting lives.No one enjoys receiving fines, but compliance with speed limits is a basic requirement of road safety. If the reduced speed limit saves even one life, isn’t it worth it? We should be prioritising the well-being of the community, not the potential inconvenience of a few extra minutes on the road.

Farmers are known for their resilience—after all, they battle unpredictable weather, fluctuating markets, and the occasional invasion of fall armyworm. But sometimes, they earn a reputation for expecting someone else to swoop in and fix their problems, like our good friend Farmer Joe.You’ve probably heard the story: the flood comes, Joe climbs onto his roof, waiting for God to save him, all the while turning down a truck, a boat, and a helicopter. When he gets to heaven, Joe’s a bit miffed with the Almighty.“Lord,” he asks, “Why didn’t you save me?” And God, perhaps with more patience than Joe deserved, replies, “I sent you a truck, a boat, and a helicopter—what more did you want?” It’s a classic tale and a warning against waiting for miracles while solutions float right by.Fortunately, the NSW dairy industry isn’t waiting for divine intervention. Faced with significant workforce shortages, dairy farmers across the region have chosen to take positive action rather than hope for a miracle.In recent years, attracting skilled workers to regional farms has been about as challenging as milking a bull. Farmers have struggled to find the right people, and the looming crisis has threatened the future of the industry.But rather than sitting on the metaphorical roof, waiting for someone to come along and fix it, the NSW dairy farmers, in partnership with DairyNSW, have been proactive in solving their workforce woes.Enter the Workforce Attraction and Retention Specialists—the heroes of this story. Among them is DairyNSW’s Tania Ketteringham, a local whizz who has been instrumental in delivering strategies to attract young workers to our regional dairy industry.With a background in employment services, Tania specialises in matching job seekers with sustainable employment opportunities. Through innovative programs like Dairy Ready—a pre-employment course that trains individuals in essential dairy skills—her efforts have led to over 85% of participants being placed into jobs, with all of them still employed three months later.DairyNSW has also introduced virtual training for workers in remote areas, helping to increase the number of traineeships and bring much-needed talent to the industry.This approach is tailored to meet the specific needs of the NSW dairy industry. Tania and the workforce specialist team collaborate with regional extension officers who specialise in areas such as finance and animal health, ensuring that farmers receive the support they need to create a positive working environment.The workforce specialist team has also been instrumental in delivering leadership and people management courses for farmers, ensuring that dairy farms are attractive places to work for both new entrants and experienced workers.Their efforts have paid off. By promoting opportunities in the dairy sector, offering training, and connecting potential employees with farms in need, Tania and her team have filled crucial job vacancies while sparking renewed interest in agricultural careers.One of the key successes has been the establishment of the Young Dairy Network, where young workers can connect with like-minded individuals, attend educational and social events, and develop supportive networks.Our region has become a shining example of what can happen when you engage the right experts. Local farms, once struggling to find workers, are now attracting fresh talent. Young people are staying on, building skills, and contributing to the community, making the dairy industry more sustainable and resilient for the future.Unlike Farmer Joe, the NSW dairy industry isn’t waiting for someone else to solve its problems. They’ve hopped into the metaphorical boat, taken the helicopter ride, and made sure they’re doing everything in their power to secure the future of dairy farming.It turns out, when you take action and work with experts like Tania Ketteringham, the results can be downright miraculous. See the previous article in The Bugle to hear from young people now working in our local dairy industry.

Opinion Piece by Lynne StrongAs the dust settles after the recent Kiama council elections, the final results offer some interesting insights into how our voting system works and what it means when candidates are elected without reaching the set quota.Out of the nine successful candidates, three—Matt Brown, Stuart Larkins, and Mike Cains—were elected despite not reaching the quota of 1,460 votes. This might raise questions: How did they get in, and what does this say about our democratic process?Understanding the QuotaIn local council elections, a quota is the number of votes a candidate needs to secure a seat outright. In this case, with 18,000 enrolled voters, the quota was set at 1,460 votes. Six candidates—Cameron McDonald, Imogen Draisma, Melinda Lawton, Yasmin Tatrai, Erica Warren, and Melissa Matters—reached the quota and were elected fairly early in the counting process.However, not all seats are filled by candidates meeting this quota. That’s where the importance of preference voting comes in.The Role of PreferencesCandidates like Matt Brown, Stuart Larkins, and Mike Cains didn’t receive enough first-preference votes to meet the quota. However, they were elected because, by the final rounds of counting, they had the highest number of remaining votes, even though they didn’t reach the quota.In a proportional representation system, as the candidate with the lowest number of votes is excluded in each round, their preferences are redistributed to other continuing candidates. This process continues until either candidates meet the quota or the remaining candidates’ vote totals are high enough that they can no longer be overtaken by others.This highlights the nuanced role of preferences—they can have a significant impact, but only if the margin between candidates is narrow enough for preference flows to make a difference.Understanding Preferences Across Different ElectionsIt appears that many people, including me and those who regularly engage in the political process, do not fully understand how preferences work. It’s important to remember that the way preferences are allocated differs across the three levels of government.At the Federal level (for the House of Representatives), it is compulsory to allocate preferences, meaning a voter must number every single box for their vote to count.At the state and local level, preferences are optional. In the NSW Lower House elections, voters can simply vote "1" and are not required to number additional boxes if they do not wish to.For local council elections, such as Kiama’s, the proportional representation system is used. This system, also applied in the Australian Senate and NSW Upper House, determines the outcome based on quotas and the redistribution of preferences.What Does This Say About the Election?Broad Community Support: Although these candidates didn’t reach the quota through first-preference votes, their election reflects broad support across the community. Voters might have chosen them as their second or third option, showing that they were seen as viable representatives, even if they weren’t the top choice for many.Fragmented Voting Patterns: The fact that three candidates were elected without reaching the quota suggests that voting was spread across many candidates. With so many individuals and groups running, voters likely had diverse views, leading to a fragmented first-preference vote. This fragmentation creates an opportunity for candidates to win seats through preference flows.Preference Allocations Can Be Critical: In some cases, like the 2021 election, every preference allocation made a difference to the final positions when candidates didn’t make quota. However, in 2024, the primary votes were more spread apart, meaning that while preferences played a role in determining the final order, the primary vote totals were decisive.It Is the Voter Who Determines Their Preferences: A crucial point to emphasise is that voters control their preferences. How voters choose to rank candidates—whether they stop at their first choice or continue ranking additional preferences—has a direct impact on the election’s outcome. Voters ultimately decide how their preferences will flow if their first-choice candidate is excluded.The Takeaway for Future ElectionsThe Kiama election is a powerful reminder of the importance of preference voting. It shows that elections aren’t just about the most popular candidates but about how the community as a whole distributes their votes. The candidates who understand the importance of preferences—and who engage with a wide range of voters—are the ones who stand the best chance of success.As we look ahead to future elections, it’s clear that preference voting can lead to more diverse representation. By giving weight to lower-preference votes, the system ensures that different voices and perspectives can still find their place on the council.For Kiama voters, this election serves as a call to action: don’t underestimate the power of your second and third preferences. They can make all the difference in shaping the future of our council.

In the coming weeks, we will be sitting down with local dairy farmers to better understand the challenges they face, and more importantly, how our community and local government can step up to support them. Our dairy farmers are the lifeblood of our region, providing fresh, milk for Australian families while operating on prime agricultural land that sits just 10 minutes from the coastline – land that many desire to live on.The reality is that much of this prime land is now owned by lifestyle farmers, making it increasingly difficult for our working farmers to grow their businesses by acquiring more land. However, despite these challenges, our dairy farmers continue to innovate. They are adapting and leveraging opportunities that arise, making the most of the resources available to them.What is particularly remarkable about our region is that our dairy farmers are among the youngest in the state, and they are doing more than just maintaining their farms – they are employing young people from the community and embracing cutting-edge technology. This forward-thinking approach ensures the future of local dairy has the potential to be bright.But with the mounting pressure of developers purchasing prime agricultural land, finding ways to ensure our dairy farms can continue to operate and grow is vital. The solution is not as simple as stopping development. Instead, we should look at encouraging developers to give long-term leases to our dairy farmers. This gives farmers the confidence they need to plan for the future and continue contributing to the local economy.We have a lot to be proud of in our local dairy industry, and through collaborative efforts, we can support it to thrive in a changing landscape. Stay tuned as we explore how, together, we can help ensure the longevity of dairy farming in our region.

Opinion by Lynne Strong Let’s be honest, what do we really achieve by sitting at home, scrolling through Facebook, and sticking metaphorical pins into developer-styled voodoo dolls? Sure, it might feel satisfying for a moment, venting frustration at housing shortages or the latest high-rise development. But after the post has been liked, commented on, and buried in the endless feed, what has really changed?The housing crisis remains, the local economy hasn’t magically improved, and the decisions shaping our community are still happening—often without your input.If we truly care about these issues—and it’s clear many of us do—then it’s time to bring the conversation out from behind our screens. At some point, we need to come to the table, have the tough discussions, and ensure that every voice in our community is not just heard but understood.Developers are easy targets, and so are council members and policy makers. The problem is, when we draw battlelines, we only fuel division. Sticking pins in voodoo dolls might feel like taking a stand, but what we need is real engagement, not angry online posts. Because here’s the hard truth: if you’re not part of the conversation, decisions will be made for you, not with you.What are the key issues? Housing affordability, land release, and economic growth are just a few, but they’re not going to be solved by another snarky tweet. These issues need the input of residents, businesses, young people, and yes, even those you might not agree with. Real solutions come when everyone is involved in the dialogue.So, before logging on to rage about the latest development, ask yourself what could be achieved by turning that energy into real conversation? By working together, instead of against each other, we can build a community that works for all of us.After all, voodoo dolls might be fun, but they won’t fix the real-world problems our community faces. 

A recent visit to the local surgery revealed an issue that is putting unnecessary pressure on both patients and healthcare staff: the two-hour parking limit outside the clinic. During a routine iron infusion, I became aware of this problem when the staff expressed concern that I might receive a parking fine. The infusion had taken longer than I expected, and the nurses were clearly worried. “We’re always getting fined,” one staff member mentioned, highlighting just how often both they and patients are penalised.Healthcare Workers and Patients at RiskThe issue is not just about one or two patients overstaying their parking. Doctors, nurses, and even emergency patients are regularly receiving fines because they are unable to move their cars in time. Staff at the surgery are often caught in last-minute emergency situations, making it impossible to step away and move their vehicles. “When it’s really busy, especially with the markets across the street, we have to park quite a distance away,” one nurse explained. “And it’s concerning to return to our cars in the dark after a long shift.”The issue extends to emergency situations as well. There have been instances where patients rushed to hospital left their cars behind, only to return and find parking fines the next day. In a profession where every minute counts, worrying about parking tickets seems unreasonable and adds to the stress of already difficult situations.The Ethical ImplicationsThis raises a pressing ethical question: Is it fair to expect healthcare workers and emergency patients to be concerned about parking fines? In a town that clearly struggles with a lack of parking spaces, should we be putting further strain on our healthcare system by penalising those who are simply doing their jobs or seeking urgent medical care?While the town faces a shortage of parking spaces, there needs to be some flexibility for those dealing with medical emergencies. Staff members often have no choice but to prioritise their patients over moving their cars, and patients in emergency situations shouldn’t be left to worry about parking while they receive necessary care.A Call to Action for the CouncilThis is an issue that urgently needs the council’s attention. While parking is a limited resource, the current regulations are disproportionately affecting healthcare workers and patients. There are several possible solutions: perhaps the council could consider special parking permits for healthcare staff, or more flexible parking zones for medical facilities where unpredictable situations arise.It’s time we asked the hard questions about the ethics of these parking regulations. Should doctors, nurses, and emergency patients be penalised for circumstances beyond their control, or is there a better solution that balances the town’s parking needs with fairness and compassion?

Leadership, like many things in society, has evolved dramatically across generations. Those over 55 often see leadership through a traditional lens – something tied to formal positions of authority. They grew up in a world where managers, heads of organisations, and CEOs were synonymous with leadership. But in today’s world, particularly for younger generations, leadership isn’t confined to titles. It’s about stepping up, setting an example, and making an impact.This shift in perspective comes from how the workplace, education, and society itself have changed. In years gone by, workplaces were hierarchies – clear, rigid structures where leaders were appointed, and everyone knew their place. Climbing the corporate ladder was the path to leadership, and that path was linear. You earned your way up, and with each rung, you assumed more responsibility and authority.Today’s world couldn’t be more different. The emergence of flatter organisational structures, the rise of the gig economy, and the importance of collaboration have turned the old ideas of leadership on their head. It’s no longer about holding a position of power; it’s about having the ability to influence, guide, and motivate others. It’s about taking responsibility when needed, regardless of your official title.For younger generations, this fluid understanding of leadership reflects the value they place on empathy, social responsibility, and adaptability. It’s not about sitting in the corner office; it’s about the impact you have, whether that’s in a boardroom or on social media. For them, the real leaders are those who inspire, lead by example, and bring others along with them.The intergenerational divide in how leadership is perceived can create friction in workplaces and communities. Older generations, accustomed to a top-down structure, may question the authority of someone who hasn’t ‘paid their dues’ in the traditional sense. Younger generations, on the other hand, may struggle to see the relevance of hierarchies that don’t seem to reflect modern values of collaboration and inclusiveness.Yet, bridging this gap offers rich potential. Older generations can embrace the idea that leadership is no longer restricted to those in formal roles. In turn, younger generations can benefit from understanding the strengths of traditional leadership structures – accountability, responsibility, and the wisdom that comes from experience.At its core, the evolving perception of leadership reflects the shifting nature of influence and responsibility. It shows us that leadership is less about where you sit and more about what you stand for. And in that, both young and old have much to learn from each other

As local elections draw near, a critical question has emerged about the use of community telephone numbers by candidates affiliated with a particular political party. Concerns have been raised regarding how these phone numbers were obtained, the ethics of their usage, and what this means for privacy in an age where data protection is more important than ever. Local residents have turned to social media to voice their concerns after being contacted.  The first question we need to ask is: How did these candidates gain access to these numbers? It is essential for transparency that candidates disclose whether these phone numbers were acquired legally through public channels, purchased from data brokers, or accessed through less transparent means. Moreover, it is worth questioning if other parties or independent candidates have access to this data or if this is a privileged advantage. Using personal data such as phone numbers for campaign purposes raises serious ethical concerns, particularly in small communities where privacy is highly valued. Local residents have voiced their discomfort, with some questioning the lack of consent in sharing their personal details for political outreach. In an era when data privacy is paramount, candidates must answer whether this kind of targeted outreach is ethical or crosses a line. The practice of contacting voters directly through unsolicited calls is not only an issue of privacy but also a question of fairness. If one party has an advantage in accessing this data, it creates an uneven playing field. The implications for democratic fairness should not be ignored, as elections are meant to provide all candidates with equal opportunities to connect with the community. It’s time we asked the hard questions about the ethics of this practice, the origins of these phone lists, and whether the people whose numbers have been used gave their consent. Our community deserves answers before casting their votes.

OpinionAs we approach the upcoming local elections, I’m reminded of some powerful words from Nick Cave, which speak directly to the challenges we face during these times of election chatter. He reflects that while cynicism is destructive and easy to fall into, hope is a hard-earned, warrior emotion that requires action and resilience.We need to ask ourselves: Are we letting cynicism dictate our conversations about the future of our community? Too often, local elections become a hotbed of negativity, focused on party affiliations and minor grievances. This is a time when we should be focusing on the big issues—housing, sustainability, and the long-term financial strain on local governments.Let’s embrace the hopeful path. Rather than letting cynicism take over, let’s ask more meaningful questions of our candidates, engage in real dialogue about the future, and remember that each of us plays a role in shaping our community for the better.These elections are our chance to keep the devil of cynicism down in the hole and build something better, together. Cynicism can be seductive and easy, but it’s far from neutral—it's contagious and destructive. While it asks little of us, it can damage those around us, especially our children. I learned this the hard way, having once held the world in contempt, not realising the impact it would have. It took a profound loss to teach me the value of life and the goodness in people. That devastation made me realise the fragility of the world and the importance of hope.Unlike cynicism, hope requires effort, yet it is essential. Every small act of love, like reading to your child or sharing something meaningful, fights against the pull of despair. These moments affirm the world’s worth and remind us it is worth protecting and believing in. Through these acts, we find that hope is not just a response—it is a powerful force for change. Nick Cave The Red Hand Files Issue #190 / April 2022 Condensed Version 

As election day approaches, many of us find ourselves in a familiar dilemma: who do we vote for when none of the candidates seem to align with our values? It’s not uncommon to feel disconnected from the names on the ballot, especially when campaign tactics leave much to be desired.Recently, I had a personal wake-up call. I discovered that the candidate I was planning to put first on my ticket was behind a campaign I find utterly cringe-worthy. It left me questioning whether I could really stand behind someone whose approach to politics feels so disconnected from the issues I care about.It seems that many voters are facing a similar struggle. In a time when political campaigning is often focused on discrediting opponents rather than proposing constructive ideas, it’s easy to feel like you’re being asked to choose the lesser of evils. But should voting be about picking someone simply because they're not as bad as the alternative?Here’s the thing: elections shouldn’t be about just avoiding the worst option. They should be about finding someone who truly represents your values and your vision for the community. Yet, in an environment where many candidates seem more focused on criticising others than offering real solutions, it’s becoming harder to make that choice.So, what can we do? We can start by looking beyond the surface of the campaign noise and asking ourselves some tough questions:What are the issues that matter most to me?Which candidate has a clear stance on these issues?Are they offering real solutions, or just playing politics?Yes, it’s hard when a candidate’s campaign style puts you off, but at the end of the day, it’s their policies and ability to deliver on them that should matter most.If you’re finding it difficult to navigate the election and make an informed choice, you’re not alone. Many of us are struggling to cut through the noise. But by focusing on the issues and what each candidate stands for, we can still make a decision that reflects our values—and ultimately helps shape the community we all want to live in.

As we head towards the local council elections, it's easy to get caught up in the noise. Campaigns are filled with promises, accusations, and critiques, and it can be difficult to sort out what really matters. One piece of advice as you consider your vote: look for candidates who focus on what they will do, not just what they won’t.There’s a difference between tearing something down and building something up. Candidates who spend their time telling you what they oppose, what they’ll stop, or what they won’t allow may sound strong in the moment. But when the dust settles, what’s left? Opposition without a plan is just an empty promise. Leadership is not about pointing fingers or drawing lines in the sand—it’s about paving a way forward, even when the path isn’t clear.We need leaders who have a vision for our community—candidates who will tell you what they plan to achieve, not what they will avoid. The reality is, progress comes from positive, forward-thinking ideas, not from standing in the way of something else.This is especially true in local government, where practical solutions to real-world problems are what matter most. Whether it’s sustainable development, better infrastructure, or improved community services, we need representatives who can tell us exactly how they will contribute to making our community a better place—not what they’ll block or reject.So, as you listen to candidates over the next few weeks, ask yourself: do they have a plan, or are they simply opposed to someone else’s? Because when the time comes, we need leaders with solutions, not just critics with complaints.

Opinion Piece by Lynne Strong I find myself deeply disappointed by the recent stance taken by Yasmin Tatrai, the leader of one of the Independent teams for the Kiama LGA council election, in which she has urged voters to put the Greens last on their ballots. Her remarks, which cast the Greens as extreme and out of touch, are not only divisive but also fail to acknowledge the valuable contributions of those who have served our community with dedication and integrity.Let me be clear: I am apolitical. I vote for whoever I believe will represent my values, regardless of party affiliation. At the local level, I have the utmost admiration for our previous Greens councillors, Kathy Rice and Jodi Keast. These women have shown what it means to have the courage of their convictions. They have stood up, been counted, and refused to succumb to the toxic “stay in line or be silenced” culture that pervades so much of our political discourse.Kathy Rice and Jodi Keast have consistently demonstrated their commitment to the community. They have advocated for sustainable development, practical conservationism, and the long-term well-being of Kiama. They have done so not because it was easy, but because it was right. Their integrity and bravery in the face of pressure are qualities we should celebrate, not diminish.Yasmin Tatrai’s rhetoric, which encourages voters to sideline the Greens, is not only a disservice to the individuals who have fought tirelessly for our community but also an oversimplification of the complex issues facing our council. To suggest that the Greens are synonymous with higher rates, budget chaos, and unnecessary bureaucracy is a misrepresentation of their record and their values.Furthermore, while standing as independents, Tatrai and her team have been transparent about their political leanings. In her own words, "I want to be up-front and transparent about our political beliefs. Whilst we are all members of the Liberal Party, we are not running an official Liberal Party ticket so we can respond to local issues, but we want to be up-front about the values we represent." It’s essential for voters to understand this context when considering their choices.I am a conservationist at heart. I believe in the importance of practical conservationism—measures that save money and protect the environment, like waste reduction, recycling, and efficient energy and water usage. These are initiatives that are not only good for our planet but also beneficial for our community’s financial health. The idea that these goals are mutually exclusive with sustainable development and fiscal responsibility is simply untrue.Moreover, the suggestion that the Greens are an obstacle to small business and progress is, in my view, unfounded. The Greens have been strong advocates for the very kinds of balanced and thoughtful development that ensure Kiama remains a vibrant and sustainable place to live and work.While I respect Yasmin Tatrai’s right to her views and her enthusiasm for serving on the council, I cannot endorse her call to marginalise a group that has shown such unwavering commitment to our community’s values. The strength of our democracy lies in its diversity of voices, and we should be wary of attempts to silence those who advocate for different approaches.In this election, I encourage everyone to vote based on the issues that matter most to them and to consider the track record of all candidates. Let us remember that a healthy council is one that includes a range of perspectives, and that true leadership is about more than just winning—it’s about standing up for what you believe in and serving the community with integrity.