The Bugle App
The Bugle App
Your local news hub
FeaturesLatest issueSports24 Hour Defibrillator sitesKCRSigna FundraisingSocial Media
The Bugle App

Blow Your Bugle

advertisement

Are some in council at war with ratepayers?
Are some in council at war with ratepayers?

20 May 2024, 6:39 AM

By Graham Pike It appears that a small group within that elected and non-elected entity we call collectively Kiama Council is at war with the Municipality’s ratepayers. The group seems to be overly sensitive to and unnecessarily publicly challenging of any criticisms – in the course of what we still regard out here in the Municipality as free speech - of perceived Council shortcomings made by ratepayers directly and through The Bugle newspaper. Why, for example, are they so increasingly antagonistic towards The Bugle, for publishing ratepayers’ letters and expressing its editorial opinions as any newspaper has a right to do and our local newspaper has been doing for 120 years or more? Now we have the spectacle of a councillor, through a motion presented to a meeting of Council, seeking to have Council spend its time and overspent resources on chasing the motivations and opinions of the owner of The Bugle. Is the councillor going to seek the same from Rupert Murdoch or Nine, the owner of the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), for example? Murdoch’s newspapers and the SMH are, like The Bugle, vehicles for the flow of news, opinions and ideas through the community and despite what anyone in Council or the community may think of them, they are essential for free speech and, indeed, democracy. And all this from a Council which is currently asking us for our help in formulating not a community antagonism strategy but a “Community Engagement Strategy”. Graham PikeJamberoo

Housing the Homeless in Kiama
Housing the Homeless in Kiama

17 May 2024, 9:53 AM

I note many properties advertised in the Kiama and surrounding areas remain untenanted for many weeks, some well over eight weeks. A change in the landlords’ approach can and may resolve this easily with some creative forward financial planning and thinking. I also note the large numbers of people viewing Open Homes, showing the demand for good quality properties at a reasonable rental figure. Could it be the rental being asked is too high for what is being offered? I have seen some poorly presented properties at inflated prices. This is shown by the number of properties being empty for long periods. Note, figures are based on a 52 week period (not a calendar year):If a rental property is rented immediately as advertised for $700 per week, this gives a gross income of $36,400 for 52 weeks.If the property is listed at $700 per week and is empty for six weeks, the loss to a landlord is $4200 per the 12 month period.Amortised over a 12 month period, equals $80.76 per week loss while the property remains vacant.After the six weeks vacancy, the gross income for the 12 months is then $32,200 per annum or $619,23 per week.Suggestions and Possible SolutionsIf the property was rented after six weeks at a lower price at $650 per week, it gives a gross income of $33,800, being better than $32, 000 by having the property empty for six weeks before being rented. This gives a landlord a gain of $1,800 over the 12 month period by simply reducing the rent.And it only gets worse if the vacancy time continues … If the property is vacant for eight weeks, the sums start to get alarming. Property is empty for eight weeks at $700 per week loss. This equals $5,600 per annum loss over the expected income of $36,400. This gives a loss of $106.69 per week or $5,547 over the expected 12 months, giving an income of $30,853 per annum.If the property is rented immediately for $600 per week, this gives an income of $31,200 per annum with no vacant time. This is gain in income of $1,347 per annum rather than stick with the accumulating loss having a vacant property.This should allow for a landlord to negotiate a better rate at renewal time by having a happy long- term tenant or get the better rental return in 12 months’ time. Happy landlords and content tenants makes a happier community

Parking situation CBD
Parking situation CBD

15 May 2024, 2:06 AM

Hi, I am a long term business owner in Kiama (>20yrs), and am very concerned with the lack of interest that the council shows towards improving the parking situation in the CBD. I am located near the Akuna street car park, the last remaining substantial parking facility in town. With the proposed development taking over this space, we will have no parking-specific spaces left in the main CBD of town. There are approximately 60 businesses from the Torys corner to the Red Rooster corner, so even with a low estimate, thats 60 car spaces required for the workers, minimum, without even considering our customers/clients/patients/tourists. Instead of focusing on builiding more housing estates and developments, our council needs to be held accountable and provide us with services to keep our town running. Recently there was a social media post from a fellow long-term business pleading for customers to keep them running. This kind of post is extremely sad, but unfortunately will be repeated by many businesses in town if we dont get more parking facilities. There are options, one significant option would be the construction of a large parking facility behind the "old firestation"/ambulance station. It is reasonably flat, and would provide access to the new park, as well as many of our CBD businesses. I have approached the council in the past, with very little outcome. I think it is time for your wide reach and readership to get this ball rolling. Im not sure how it could be done, but would it be something that you guys would consider shining the spotlight on, before its too late? Thanks for all you do for our great town, keep up the great work!Name Supplied

From Plans to Progress. Uniting Kiama's Community for a Thriving Future
From Plans to Progress. Uniting Kiama's Community for a Thriving Future

28 April 2024, 10:25 PM

In Kiama, we are at a pivotal moment. As our community grows, so must our approach to agriculture, especially dairy farming, which is crucial to our local economy. Recently, some councillors proposed a 'Rural Futures Committee', a necessary step that we need to take seriously. Let's consider what this could mean for Kiama, particularly if we had properly used available funds after the 2020 Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS). This statement set out our goals such as sustainable growth and protecting our environment — big plans that are now waiting to be brought to life. Imagine if we had already started a Rural Futures Committee, backed by a simple yet effective communication strategy that kept everyone up-to-date. Picture a Kiama where updates on community projects are shared not just in council meetings but through straightforward articles in the local paper, posts on familiar social media platforms, and easy-to-use websites.Think about how a straightforward media effort could have helped everyone in Kiama feel more connected and involved. Simple videos showing local farmers at work, easy-to-understand diagrams explaining new farming policies, and regular updates could have made a big difference. This isn't just about sharing information; it's about bringing everyone together to support these initiatives.Transparency builds trust. If we had a committee focusing on our rural future, we could have shared every small win in improving our dairy operations or conserving our beautiful landscapes. Sharing these successes could help everyone see the value of their support and involvement.What if you could quickly check a basic website to see the real benefits of the projects happening around you? This could have shown how efforts are improving not just farming but our entire community, allowing everyone to give feedback and get involved.Too often, it seems councils talk too much without doing enough. A Rural Futures Committee could change this by moving from repetitive discussions to real, impactful community involvement. This means creating opportunities where our farmers and residents are actively engaged in shaping what happens next.By working together with local businesses, schools, and community groups, we could have made our agricultural projects more effective and beneficial for everyone.Starting a Rural Futures Committee could really change the game for Kiama, turning our plans into reality. It's high time we match our discussions with decisive actions and clear communication. This isn't about keeping things as they are; it's about making sure our community thrives now and in the future.Let's not just keep talking about what we could do; let's start doing it. Kiama deserves an approach that really puts plans into action and includes everyone in the process. Let's work together for a prosperous, sustainable future that makes all of us proud.

Going Round in Circles: It's Time to Address the Elephant in the Room
Going Round in Circles: It's Time to Address the Elephant in the Room

28 April 2024, 4:16 AM

In Kiama, like many other places, the community engagement cycle can sometimes feel like a never-ending merry-go-round. In 2020, with a great deal of input from the community, the council decided on key priorities ranging from managing sustainable growth to protecting our environment. So, you might be wondering, as I am, what exactly the council hopes to achieve with its recent call for more community engagement. Haven’t we already established our priorities?Let's face it, the true elephant in the room isn't a lack of community insight or ideas; it's funding—or, more precisely, the lack thereof.We've extensively discussed and agreed on what needs to be done: balance housing supply and demand, support our rural landscapes, develop a resilient economy, and more. These aren't just whimsical ideas but essential actions that have been put on paper, debated, and planned out. These plans, like protecting viable agriculture and championing architectural excellence, are meant to lead us into a sustainable future. Yet, here we are, spinning our wheels, discussing what has already been discussed.The notion that we need further consultation is frankly bewildering. It suggests a disconnect, not just between the council’s activities and the community's pulse, but between planning and action. One can't help but feel that these rounds of engagement are, unintentionally perhaps, a means of biding time—time during which the pressing issues we face continue to evolve without resolution.What the community needs now is not more talk but the money to make these plans a reality. It's time for the council, and indeed all stakeholders, to acknowledge this gap between our aspirations and our capabilities. We need a shift from ideation to execution. Securing funding, whether through governmental assistance, private investment, or innovative financial models like public-private partnerships, should be our paramount focus.We must also hold our local government accountable for not just drawing up plans but also implementing them. It’s crucial that the council prioritises obtaining and allocating resources to where they're most needed, as outlined in our Local Strategic Planning Statement.So, while community engagement is undoubtedly valuable, it must not be an exercise in futility. Let's ensure it is a prelude to action, not a substitute for it. We have the roadmap; now let’s get the car moving. And to the council, it’s high time we address this elephant, don’t you think? It's time to stop going round in circles and start making strides towards the future we've all agreed upon. 

Never Underestimate the Value of Trust in Development Projects
Never Underestimate the Value of Trust in Development Projects

22 April 2024, 5:50 AM

In the quiet corners of communities like Kiama, the whispers of urban development are often met with scepticism and resistance. The recent refusal of the Springside Hill project by the community and council, despite its promising proposal, underscores a pervasive issue: the deficit of trust between developers and the communities they serve.Developers, historically sitting low on Roy Morgan's list of most trusted professions, face an uphill battle in convincing communities of their intentions and capabilities. This isn't merely a local phenomenon but a widespread sentiment reflecting years of promises made and not kept. Given the position of developers on the trust spectrum - consistently ranking near the bottom alongside car salespeople and politicians - it begs the question: how can communities confidently believe that developers will deliver what they promise?The Springside Hill proposal seemingly offered everything the Kiama community demanded: a diversity of housing types, affordable housing options, and substantial infrastructure improvements and job creation. Yet, the community said no. This decision may appear surprising at first glance, but it's deeply rooted in past disappointments.Consider the statistics presented in the Springside Hill proposal:·       88% of locals acknowledge housing affordability as a problem.·       77% are concerned about locals moving away due to high costs.·       64% note a lack of sufficient housing supply.The developers responded with a pledge to set aside 25% of the development for affordable housing, aiming to meet an estimated 50% of the identified needs for such housing. Additionally, they promised over 9,700sqm of commercially zoned land and significant job creation during and after construction. On paper, the project aligns with the community's needs and desires. Yet, the shadow of distrust looms large.This situation illustrates a crucial lesson: trust is the cornerstone of any successful development project. Without it, even the most well-intentioned proposals face rejection. Trust is not built overnight nor through promises alone. It is earned through consistent, transparent actions and a demonstrated commitment to the community's well-being over time.Developers must go beyond the blueprint stages and actively engage with the communities. Regular updates, open dialogues, and clear evidence of following through on commitments are essential. Community trust can be fostered by involving local stakeholders in the planning process and ensuring that their feedback genuinely influences the project.As communities continue to grapple with growth and development pressures, the role of trust becomes even more critical. It’s not just about building houses and infrastructure but about cultivating an environment where people feel heard, respected, and valued. Only then can developers hope to transform their image from the least trusted to reliable partners in progress.In the end, embracing transparency, prioritising consistent communication, and delivering on promises are not just strategic moves but moral imperatives. If developers wish to succeed where others have failed, they must recognize that in the world of community development, trust is just as crucial as the concrete used to build homes.

Cleanaway Garbage Bins - Eyesore
Cleanaway Garbage Bins - Eyesore

11 April 2024, 3:24 AM

We are writing re large Cleanaway garbage bins located on southern end of "Bathers", 65 Manning St, Kiama - in a NO STOPPING ZONE - opposite Silica Restaurant.These bins area a constant eyesore in a prominent tourist part of town - more so when one or other of them is packed to overflowing as is the case at the moment, and has been so since last week. They are situated over a drain where a lot of debris gathers which can't be cleared away by street cleaners. Cleanaway have the responsibility of emptying these bins which service MOIST N GLAZED, a business located in Unit 2/28 Bong Bong St.We have contacted Council on more than one occasion (and Cleanaway also) wondering whether the bins could be relocated, but have been told they were moved to Manning St because there was nowhere to place them in Bong Bong St near the shop mentioned above. They were previously located on the premises of the Mower and Repair shop which was sold.The bins are used by the public and visitors alike who stuff anything in them, including soiled nappies and large bags of garbage, even when the red bin in particular is full well past its capacity. The smell emanating from the bins is not pleasant for passersby.We were wondering if there is any way the Bugle could highlight this situation which perhaps could result in these bins being relocated to another area. We have seen a utility stop by on occasions and drop off rubbish. Presumeably this comes from MNG and therefore the possibility exists for MNG's rubbish to be taken to another nearby location. This could perhaps prevent the bins being exposed to the public in general.We would be very appreciative of any assistance you could give us in this matter. Joan and Bill

61-80 of 169